colleen

The speaker gives feedback on three questions. For the first question, they advise the speaker to clarify which statement they agree with before giving their opinion. They also suggest providing more development and asking more questions. For the second question about AI, the speaker agrees that AI should not replace social professions, but suggests giving concrete examples. The speaker's point about young people participating in politics is interesting, but they need to provide more details and specify who they are addressing. The speaker also provides feedback on the speaker's language skills, advising them to work on their flow and pronunciation of certain words. Overall, the speaker's arguments are understandable, but there are some minor language mistakes that can be easily corrected. So, concerning the first question, it's quite correct, but don't forget to start by mentioning which statement do you agree with, because you start by I agree, but we don't know what you're talking about. We understand it concerns maybe the duration of a day of class, or maybe the number of hours of class you have in a day, because you mentioned staying in class for eight hours, being tired, and it's difficult for the exams, so maybe you're talking about this. Your arguments are quite correct and coherent. You should maybe develop a little more, and also ask other questions to the person you're talking to. But as a whole, it stays quite understandable and correct. Okay, so let's move to question two. It concerns AI, so artificial intelligence. You should maybe just state it once, what it means, AI, and not hey, I. AI is artificial intelligence, don't forget to mention it. So you say that for you, it should not replace all kinds of professions, and stealing jobs from human people, we can consider. Okay, so you give your opinion, it's correct, it's your personal point of view. You mentioned also that, especially concerning social professions, it should not replace human people, because it should be properly done by human, because it's supposed not to be robotic professions, but something to do with emotions and sensibility, something that a robot or machine cannot have. And maybe you could develop a little, because you reformulate and you repeat yourself, but you don't argument with concrete examples of professions that could be impacted. Maybe it could be the nurses, maybe it could be teachers, I don't know. So try to give concrete examples for your presentation, but the good point is that you answer back and ask the opinion of the person you are speaking to, so that's quite good. Finally, concluding the last question, it's quite interesting too. Okay, you mentioned that there is a difference between generations, and that the young generation should evolve, or maybe not to be so keen on traditions, and holding to traditions, and move on, evolving. And so that's why you say that young people should vote, should participate, you should develop on it. Should vote. So vote means to participate in their political life, get engaged in their social and professional and political life, so that's an argument. And you say also that as for yourself, concerning your personal point of view, as a young people and a young woman, you don't feel quite enough listened, and that's interesting, okay? You don't feel listened, but by whom, okay? Don't forget to precise, mention it, who do you address, who is responsible for it, are the young a little responsible of it, or is it only to blame the politicians? So give details on it. But otherwise, it's interesting, your arguments are valid, and so you answer back, you question the person you're talking to, so that's quite a good point. So I'm going to move on to the linguistic part now, so your flow is a little slow, but understandable. So indeed, we can understand that you want to take your time to be more at ease, so it's quite understandable. Maybe you worked a little more to be a little faster, a little more fluid to get closer to the natural intonation, but it's correct, it's understandable, it's correct. Your vocabulary, so there are no major mistakes. In terms of pronunciation, it's still understandable and correct. Be careful with the H-words that come up a lot, like in Artificial Intelligence, you say Hey, I, and not Hey, I, quite simply, and it also comes up in other words, the H-words. Also be careful with Think and Thing, so things and thoughts that are two different words, and in your place, it's sometimes a little, it lacks perception. And also a false friend who supports, who doesn't mean support but support, and sometimes it can play on understanding. So, overall, it's still understandable. And one last little thing too, be careful with Listen, so you have to say Listen to without me, but not just Listen without me. So, in general, according to small language mistakes, nothing dramatic, you can easily rework that without any problem, and everything remains understandable in terms of pronunciation and the flow is quite correct overall.