Lescop

The speaker provides feedback on a language assignment. They suggest that the student's responses are too short and lack detail. They advise the student to slow down their speech and articulate more clearly. They also recommend providing more arguments, examples, and details in their responses. They note that the student's language is generally understandable and correct, with some pronunciation improvements needed. Overall, the student needs to work on developing their arguments and providing more supporting information in future exercises. Copie de l'escope Lillian, devoir d'anglais numéro 6 du niveau 1er, partie expression orale en continu. Okay, so for the first question, your production is really, really short, not even 20 seconds. You should last at least 1 minute, 1 minute 30, so work on it and on your time, please. Furthermore, you speak really, really fast, so yeah, take your time and slow down. And so, I didn't quite understand everything you said, but you mentioned kind of a competition of drawing to raise awareness of young children, taking the form of a competition. It would be concerning about schools and the goal would be to better learn about other cultures, so it's still kind of vague, even if we understand your point. You should really give a lot more arguments, examples of activities to develop, what they could learn, what would be the concrete goals of this, so really give more details. Then the second question is about organizing a charity run, and you think it's a good idea, for the BNA community, so you should maybe detail what it is, because it's still vague. And so, you have questions about this, what would be the sponsor, where will it be organized, how could it be organized, and also, it needs funds to do it, so okay. And you say it's still a very good project, because those people need funds, because they suffered of some inequalities, I think, so again, your production is still very short, 30 seconds, and you don't give enough details about this project of charity running. So, you could have a concrete example of charities, you could have them do some research, develop what is a BNA generation, and that's it, yes, you should really argument more, take your time, and speak more slowly, too. And so, concerning the last production, you agree that police officers who do that should be protected, but explain what is that, what are they doing, exactly. And then, it's a little bit confused, you said they don't get enough contribution, I don't think it's a right word, so then you take again, and you said they don't receive enough credit, I think. And so, you finish by asking a question, what would happen to the police officers who do bad actions, that's it, would they go to jail or not, would they have to pay for their acts, like current police officers would be confronted to do. So, yes, again, your production is quite short, you should develop more your arguments, give some details about the objectives of such a policy, and concretely how it would work, who would be concerned, and any idea of action, of prevention, too, to develop, well, you could develop really more ideas about it. I will now move on to the linguistic part of your audio, so your productions are quite short, that has already been mentioned. In fact, your language is, overall, understandable, despite your very fast flow, so try to reduce, to slow down your flow a little bit, and to articulate more, because the words are a little messed up, so unfortunately, I didn't necessarily understand all the words you were pronouncing. Overall, your language is correct and simple, no major mistakes, and you still make efforts of pronunciation to get closer to an authentic accent. But really, you have to work on the argumentation, because your productions lack concrete arguments, ideas to develop, facts, figures, dates, that's it, all that can really enrich your productions in the future exercises. But everything remains correct.