The speaker discusses the Norwegian saboteurs known as the Oslo Gang and their actions during World War II. The gang opposed the Nazi regime's plan to call up young Norwegian men for labor duty and engaged in acts of sabotage to disrupt the registration process. The speaker also talks about the importance of protecting personal information and references a section of the Health and Safety at Work Act that prohibits inspectors from accessing health status information without consent. They highlight the need to challenge the collection and use of personal data. The speaker encourages listeners to learn about the Oslo Gang and the term "quisling" which refers to a traitor or collaborator with an enemy occupying force. They also mention the upcoming appearance of Posey Parker and discuss the issue of land ownership in New Zealand. The speaker expresses skepticism towards politicians and the need for change.
Yep. I'll record now then. Yep, so it's going to be short. I'm moving house. You can't see it on the Zoom, but I'm surrounded with boxes and stuff. Yeah, it's pretty horrendous, isn't it, moving? Yeah, and we're just going to talk about something inspiring tonight. Awesome. We're going to talk about Norwegian saboteurs, and in particular, a group called the Oslo Gang. You can look them up. The spelling of it is Oslo, that's O-S-L-O, and then G-J-E-N, G-E-N, so probably Oslo Gengen, something like that.
Somebody who speaks Scandinavian language could probably tell us more. Here's something about them. In May 1944, the Nazi regime were planning a call-up of men born in 1921, 1922, and 1923. To take it back to 1940, Norway got invaded by the Nazis in 1940, and they weren't free until 1945, so they were under the control of the occupation of the Nazis for five years. Now, I don't know if any of you are familiar with the word quisling.
That's Q-U-S-L-I-N-G. A quisling is somebody who's a traitor to their own country, basically, and that was the name. It comes from the name of the PM or whatever he was at the time, but it also sounds like they had a traitorous Minister of Justice as well. Now, doesn't this ring a bell to you guys? Okay. So what they were planning was a call-up of all men born in 1921, 1922, and 1923, so their young men around their 20s upwards, right? And that was to what was called National Labour Duty.
Early in 1944, a secret memorandum from the Minister of Justice, and that's in quotation marks, Severe Rysnaks, as I say, somebody who speaks a Scandinavian language will be able to correct that, proposed to send 75,000 young Norwegians to the German-Soviet war front. Okay? Well, young men, actually. So, you know, that was pretty much death. You went to the Soviet war front, you went to the front, yeah, that was it. You were gone. Now, it was secret, and it had been revealed and published by the underground press.
We sort of, even these days, you know, we have it easy, don't we? At least we can publish it. The media tries to stop us, of course, but we're still going, okay? We're not being held up in the street and shot yet, but we get an occupation here, that would be the next thing. The resistance movement decided to oppose their plans by every available means. Their first sabotage was against the Arbeit Jensen, or something like that, which is the labour, you know, caller.
The registration, oh, it was the registration of young people for labour duty. Destruction of the machine for sorting registration cards, 18th of May, and on the 17th of June, 1944, the destruction of the registration office in Oslo. Now, this is what I'm referring to, and I'll tell you my, you know, how I understand the story, because I didn't have time today to actually find the story, but that's what I was referring to. Over the summer, thousands of young people left their homes and hid in the forest to avoid the caller.
When the Nazi authorities discovered this, they tried to prevent them getting food supplies. Just goes on, doesn't it? By denying them ration cards. Now, as a counter-action, Oslo gang performed a hold-up against a truck in August of 1944, securing the truckload of cards. So they just took the cards off them and sent them around. They also had some other actions. I particularly like these ones, because it's information, control of information that we're talking about here. They, it looks like they destroyed two sulphur acid factories.
They were to be used in making bombing materials. And the bus garage, the destruction of a bus garage, resulted in the destruction of 25 Messerschmitt fighter planes and 150 airplane motors. There were 10 members in that group. Wow. 10 members. Wow. Yeah. So it just shows you, if you use your head, you can do a lot of, you can do a lot of things. Now, our technique, of course, is not to go around destroying stuff. They've got too smart for that anyway.
They've got all of this stuff online. Our technique is to find the weapons of law that stopped them doing it in the first place, right? Now, what I'm talking about in particular is section 1684 of the Health and Safety at Work Act. Now, I talked a little bit about that on Wednesday night. Did you happen to get a picture of that at all, Emma? No, I didn't. Sorry. You think you could bring it up? I'll talk to it while you find it.
So it's the Health and Safety at Work Act, section 168, subsection 4. Now, this is basically inspectors at WorkSafe, to make workplaces safe, can get a lot of information from the workplace. But they have no right to get any information about your health status, and that's what subsection 4 tells you. They can't have anything that identifies you. Right, you can see this is which is most important. So what can they do under section 168? Can you take it, Tiffany? We'll just sort of put people into where they are.
So they have powers of entry and inspection. Now, when I looked at this before, I hadn't read the whole thing. But back in the day, I thought about this because of doctor surgeries. And I actually suggested this to Matt Sherrington, actually. I said, you know, WorkSafe has got powers to enter workplaces. They could go to these doctors because they were trying to get samples of the vaccine, right? They could go and get, they could have got those vaccines out of the workplaces, right, of the doctors.
And I think that they will be the people who we will, when we get our justice, they will be the people that will be sent in to get all of this stuff out of the workplaces, right? All the registers, right, that have got people's information on, those have to come out. They have to be destroyed. That was never supposed to be collected in the first place. That'll be one of the things that we'll be pushing for in the end, the destruction of all of those registers, right? Okay, so they can conduct examinations, which is of stuff, right, and machinery, etc.
Tests, inquiries and inspections, or direct the PCVU, or a person who appears to be in charge of the workplace to conduct examinations, tests, inquiries or inspections. Now these are not on the body of the worker, remember, because they're not even allowed to take a sample without the fully informed consent. Okay, so pop on down, so they can take photographs, measurements and sketches and drawings. They can basically get all of the evidence that's required for prosecutions. They have a lot of power.
Okay, let's go back down to, let's go down to 4, and it covers everything that, right, we get to 4. Despite subsection 1e, if all or any part of the information relates to a person's health status and identifies the person, an inspector must not, without that person's consent, require the production of the information, or examine the information, or make a copy of or take an extract from the information. So basically, we're going to be after them for everything that they have collected unlawfully, right? So that is going to be a thing for the future.
But it reminded me then of the story, the destruction of the registration office at Oslo prevented the information, the data they had, having, making it, making it be, allowing it to be used. Because when they had the registration details, they had the names, they had the addresses, they had the ages, right? So the registration is a very big, a very big thing in all of this. They wanted, not just to, because it was going to be used, if you look at the order, the information, you were going to have to have a card, and as you moved from workplace to workplace, that card was going to go with you.
That information was going to go with you, and they were going to, even if you left a job, they'd, you wouldn't be able to get another job without that registration, you know, whether you were vaccinated or not, going with you. Okay, that was their plan. Now that has got, that, we've got the basis for destroying all of those records, I believe. And it's just like destroying that record-keeping place in Oslo, because that's what they were, that's what they were wanting it for, that, to do us harm, right? To do workers harm.
So that's pretty much all I've got to talk about tonight, but I'd really encourage you to go and have a look at what, you know, especially encourage the young ones who don't know about this stuff. These were only 20-year-olds. Wow, yep. But they were 75,000, 75,000 young ones they were going to call up and send to the Soviet front. Young ones of today need to understand this and understand that 10 men had put a stop to it.
Yep. So congratulations to the Norwegians. Find out what a quisling is and why it's such a term of insult, because it was a family name, right? It's like being called Hitler, quisling. I'd say everybody in that family went and changed their names after a while. I bet. Right? Yeah. So we've got time. Now, what's time? We've only gone just 18 minutes, probably about 15, because I wasn't here until about three minutes past. So, you know, tell us about any ideas.
Oh, yeah, well, this is called sabotage, right? We're not sabotaging anybody, right? We're not sabotaging anybody. We all have the right to our information, and they have no right to it at all. They never had any right to be encouraging employers to make sure people were vaccinated. You see, in the end, if we'd known about this section of the Act, we could have said, you're not having my information, it's against the law for you to have it.
And that would have pulled their whole scheme to bits. But we will be able to use it in the future, because I believe we can call for the destruction of all of those registers. Yep. Thanks, Geoff. That's good. What's Geoff put up there? The definition of quisling, yeah. A term used in Scandinavian language and in English, meaning a citizen or politician of an occupied country who collaborates with the enemy occupying force, or more generally, as a synonym for a traitor.
Yeah, well, the word is a family name. It's a family surname. And the PM, or whatever he was, was quisling. His second name was quisling. Yeah. That's a great term. A bit like shill. That's another one that's a bit like that. Shill, yeah. Quisling. And, you know, from what we've heard about and what we've seen about the people that they are letting into this country without being vaccinated from Afghanistan and Ukraine. Yeah. And then at least the Herald starts to talk about the 50 largest landholders in the country, and some of them are completely owned by foreign investors from all sorts of places, not just China.
Yeah. Yeah. All sorts of places. Japan's got some. Korea's. I don't know about Korea. Japan's got a whole lot. They hadn't even included Iwi and Crown land in it, basically. Yeah. But there's a lot of crossovers, right, with the private and public sector in those ones. And they were pointing out, actually, the Herald were pointing out, the biggest clumps of land were forestry. And one of them is a forestry company that just does it for what's called carbon credits.
Now, carbon credits, you don't chop the trees down. No. They just sit there taking up our good farmland, and then they sell them so that other people can pollute. So people who've got countries who've got more money than New Zealand buy carbon credits. And we've got huge swathes of our countryside taken up. So other countries like China, I don't know who else buys carbon credits. I know China does, or possibly doesn't bother. But other countries can pollute.
But, I mean, the thing is that what we know now is actually carbon is not a pollutant. Having carbon in the air is what we need to grow things. So, you know, this whole carbon credit thing has been a whole load of khaki to make a whole lot of money so that you can actually control people. Absolutely, because they don't take into account pasture land. It's just ridiculous. Yeah, but, I mean, they're talking about, you know, this whole green thing.
They're talking about making the cows eat something so they don't burp. That's not natural. Cows have got to burp. Yeah. Oh, okay. What was Winston talking about, Alicia? He was talking about a lot of stuff. I think I sent you the link as well, Liz, if you want to watch it later. It was on Facebook. I'm sure it's on other platforms as well. But he was very much addressing all the, getting rid of all the anti-woke stuff that's going on in New Zealand, along with, you know, looking at the ridiculous mandates and all, so many issues, Liz.
All the stuff that basically, you know, the freedom movements and that have been going on about for so long. He made a particular point in saying that the biggest issue that we do currently have is our health system. And he said, even though he is triple-vaxxed, he believes in people's rights to be upheld, the freedom to choose. You know, people shouldn't be mandated out of jobs. It's even more ridiculous in the health system when we've got a crisis going on just in our health system.
How smart would he be if he hadn't got vaxxed? He's already working on an impaired brain, as far as I'm concerned. So, you know, he's always pretty onto it. Yeah. Interesting. It was interesting, for sure. But we'll see. We'll see. You know, it's only the opening, you know, campaign. As far as I'm concerned, politics can do this. Yeah, yeah. So it's going to be interesting just to see what develops as we get closer, I suppose, to see what comes out of the woodworks.
Well, I don't want any of them getting, I don't want to see elections in this country ever again. They are too dangerous. Politicians are far too dangerous. Yeah, I agree, Liz. We've got one in this mess over the last hundred years, if not longer. So, yeah. Yeah. I'm not sure if anyone else has anything to add, but they might have heard some other things. So I'll leave the floor open for others to comment. Jeff's got his hand up anyway.
Yeah. Go, Jeff. I just posted a very good link from Wikipedia about Quisling. Oh, good. Thanks. His name and his history and what he got up to and all that good stuff. So it's there. It's interesting. As far as we're concerned. Yeah. And here's another thing about who was the minister of, his name is, if you can look this one up, Jeff, the minister of justice was somebody called Severe. I think it's S-E-V-E-R-E. And then his second name is R-I-I-S-N-A-E-S.
Okay. And what they did at the end of the war, they secured the records of the Ministry of Justice and Police to stop them being destroyed. Now, we're more fortunate that they're with the internet now, that nothing is ever lost. But keep bringing up your store of knowledge because what they're doing is not so much because they can't destroy it. Once it's in the net, you know, it's never gone. But what you can do is get those OIAs going and keep them and download the information for yourself about what went on.
Because if they're going to follow the Nazi plan right through, and I'm pretty sure they are, they're going to just try and destroy stuff and they're going to head off into the wild blue. But they're not getting away this time, you know. Apparently Quisling was executed by firing squad in 1945. Well, darn it all. He's got his just desserts. Interesting piece, this Wikipedia. Well worth a look. They are disappearing, Google. You know, like when you look on Google and you look how many pages there are, it says there's like 300 million results.
But that's just rubbish because you get past page one or two and there's really nothing there. Yeah, yeah, that's right. I think it's, yeah. You don't want to be past page three, I don't think. No, there is the Wayback Machine, which is an Internet archive. Yeah, that is, apparently. That's really useful, that Wayback Machine. I found some interesting stuff in there. What's Lynette say about tomorrow will be interesting with Posey Parker? Oh, what's going on with Posey Parker? Lynette? Lynette's got, Lynette's put up tomorrow will be interesting with Posey Parker.
Trans activists will counter protest. Yeah. Is she going to be here? He, I think he means Nosey Parker, don't you, Lynette? Posey. Posey? That's the one they didn't want to let in. Yeah. Oh, oh, oh, you mean, oh. She looks a little darker. Give me a second. Yeah, I used to watch her. I used to watch her. She's English, eh, blonde. Yeah. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, they're trying to stop her coming in because she's, she's, she's for the rights of women as women.
Yeah, and she actually has landed in Auckland. Good on her. Yeah, I totally agree. Well, there was also some good news from the Auckland Mayor. I was talking to a friend this afternoon. She said that he's not the, what is it called? It's an advisory committee. Basically, they're the ones who've been funding all of these maniacs. Local Government New Zealand. That's the outfit. Was it Local Government New Zealand? Yeah, yeah. And they're woke as. And because they've been saying, I think the public probably told the council, we don't want all of this stuff that you put on.
Especially, we don't want you funding people like that horrible woman that people heard about a little while back. Who'd done that awful so-called poem that Ben was supposed to be put into some sort of show. And it's basically what the story of the poem was. The narrative of the poem was that island women should sort of lure young white men and kill them. Because of colonialism. Yeah, this is a horrible. Even, I think, not even. I mean, anybody would have.
Callie J. Keane. Yeah, yeah. That's what her name is. Yeah. Callie Keane. Yeah. She's an absolute horror. It was really dreadful. Really dreadful stuff. It was inciting murder, actually. That is not free speech. Anyone inciting murder, you've got to stop. It was to do with Captain Cook. That's right. What would you know about Captain Cook? What a dummy most of us Google up. You know, you dig a little into them and you see, oh, you've just been watching TV.
You've been listening to revisionist history. Read something that comes from the time and you'll find out what really went on. Yeah. No, horrible, horrible woman. Actually, Willie Jackson's cousin did the same sort of thing. Hannah Jackson. She changed her name in the end. But she died a few years ago. And so did her husband, Sid Jackson. They're cousins to Willie. Okay. And Moana Jackson, also the guy who's up in the United Nations doing all of his nasty work up there.
He's died recently, too. Willie is still hanging around like a bad smell. I was away in Japan at the time. And my mother wrote to me and said, you know what that Hannah Jackson said? She said that young men should kill a Pākehā. You know, that it would be worth going to jail to kill a Pākehā. She said, I've had that woman in my house. What the hell is she? Because, of course, I knew Hannah and Sid back in the day.
Yeah. I'll tell you one thing. I have to wonder about the mayor of Auckland, because in view of what he did with New Zealand, local government of New Zealand, that is really major. And when he was the mayor up here in the far north, he was about as much juice as an ashtray on a motorbike then. He was absolutely terrible. So whether he's out of Damascus road experience or what, I don't know. Well, the thing is, Geoff, I think that they're pulling their heads in, quite frankly.
I don't think that they've changed their mind. But they've seen the writing on the wall. I don't like to throw all of these, you know, sounds like I'm talking in. He's also been telling Land Transport, isn't it, New Zealand, about all their road cone carry-ons, completely ridiculous. Oh, yeah. Yeah, we'll have to see for a while. But, yeah, I love now the attacks on the wokeness and the rewriting of history. And, you know, apparently the Greens are absolutely furious because a whole lot of their programs have been cut.
Because they're all, you know, idiots. Do get a real job. Yeah. Statistics New Zealand, they're going all woke as well. Oh, yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. Now, you see, those registration cards were collected for all of the people, the young men. And what about the, you know, all the records of everybody born in 1921, 22 and 23? Who would they have been collected by? The equivalent of our statistics, right? So we know the ones that we've got. It's an information war, right? It's an information war.
We've got to get as much information on them and withhold as much information about ourselves as possible. So well done, everybody who didn't fill in the census. We had another census form put in our letterbox today, or yesterday. How about it? And they'd already delivered one before, because, as I think I told you, we kicked them off the property for trespassing. And now we've got another one. Yeah. Oh, well, you know. I've got a friend who's working for them doing nothing, you know, and people have got to make their money.
But they're not, you know, the actual people delivering the census, that's not their fault, right? Everybody's got to make some money. The sheeple. It's the people up the bloody top that we've got to get hung to the border. Yep. Someone says, Sean Plunkett, feminist writer Yvonne Van Dongen doesn't hold back on Pet Posey Parker. Probably. You know, I mean, this whole thing has been, you know, a battle really between the trans and the feminists and all of that.
But some of us are just women, right? And don't like what's going on with it. They make, you know, feminist writers, she probably makes a lot of money out of it. I think most women don't like it. It's only the stupid media that makes it seem otherwise. Well, there's some pretty weird ones out there, Emma. There's really some very weird women. I don't see them out on the farm. No, you're lucky. You're lucky. Anyway, guys, I'm going on and I've got to continue packing up stuff.
Hey, Liz, if you don't want us to, Ness would like to, she's done a bit more work on her. Oh, please, yes. Sorry, Jeff. And Jeff, did you want to say something else, Jeff? And then we could have. I was just going to say I read today where World Athletics, whatever that is, has made a ruling that transgender women cannot compete in any women's sports. So that's nice. Well done. Well done, World Sports. Two other good pieces of, oh, here's my truck.
Oh, yeah. If you need to, it'll be. But I'll go and you continue on with Ness. OK. Cool. OK. Thanks, Liz. Yep. Catch you later. OK. Ness, do you want to come on and I've made it so you can share. OK. I don't know how capable I am of sharing because I've got like maybe 200 windows open. Oh, I can know it if you want. Or something crazy like that. But you'll see the PDF that I just put in the comments there.
Oh, I don't think I can. What I would probably have to, yeah. I've sent them to everyone. So if everyone, you'll see some PDFs which have the dates. I think it's just above Alicia's comment and Joanne's. There's three PDFs. Those PDFs are on the Rumble page, how I put in the timeline and content links. So what I've done separately is made that content into a PDF. So that PDF can be open while you're watching the Rumble account.
And it's got the hotkey so you can follow without scrolling down to the content of the Rumble account but having the PDF alongside. So you'll be able to use those study notes with all the content links to be able to come out of that one hour or two hours knowing every version of everything that's happened during that entire one. So like even for example, I'll try to share. I'll just open up this one here. The dominoes continue the full PDF.
I'll just go ahead and share. If you can, I can, if you want to send it to me, I'll share it. Do I send it to you privately or through the? I think what I probably, all I'll need to do is just go. I've saved one. I'll go find it on my computer and then, but see how you go and I'll go find it in the meanwhile. Yeah. And I've got like. I'm not sure where it sticks.
Here we go. I think this is it here. So am I sharing screen there? Yes, you are. Okay. Right. How do I know what I can see? Okay. So you can see here, can't you? Okay. Yeah. The screen here with the PDF. Yeah. So you'll see the dominoes continue to fall. If you would click that link under, that takes you to that video. So you would have the PDF open. So we're clicking on that link to the video.
So if you're on a computer, you've got the hotkeys for viewing on a PC under there. So if you've watched something, you want to go back 10 seconds. So just a day or four, most of the time I'm going back just to re-listen to what I've heard to really understand, understand it. You've got the timeline here, which you can see is any topic that Liz has discussed that moves on to a new topic. Oh, that's how you do that? Yeah.
So each time represents a new subject or someone else speaking. Is that correct? Yep. Yep. And you'll come down to the content link, and the content links are in line or correspond in the timeline. I haven't actually matched them up. But say in the beginning here, we were talking about it was Nikki Turner and her contract with her husband Tony from Botarga University for Educate Vaccinators. So I had no idea what any of that was about, and I cannot continue a video without understanding it.
So then, because I was going to be moving on to something, that was an important part that Liz wanted to bring up. So to follow on with that, you can see that I found the information about Nikki Turner, about the contract. There's something else about a new vaccination call coming up. And then it kind of leads me off into all sorts of things to find all about Nikki and vaccinators. And then, you know, we've got, as you mentioned, the Medicines Act.
So we've got the Medicines Act 1984, Clause 44A. So you can click on this link here. That's going to take you to that legislation. And then things like the pincer movement. Well, I didn't know what a pincer movement was. This mentions a word, and I don't know what it is. I need to know, because if someone uses it again, then I can imagine that I know. Oh, OK, I know what this conversation is. So the pincer movement, which was about, you know, which way to attack the corruption.
And it wouldn't be just at the top or bottom. It would be surrounding them. So I thought it was quite fascinating. And then again, there's that right versus the Pipkin case here. So a lot of references made to it. So pretty much every reference that Liz has made, I really got fascinated with the Divine Right of Kings and Charles I, with his execution. So I spent a little time going through the, and as you said, there was an Act of Law come in, the Declaration of Parliament.
And then there was the Interregnum. Excuse me. Hang on. And then there was the, during the Interregnum, what came in was the Actual Ordinances of the Interregnum. So all of this just sort of led me down paths that I would never, ever adventure to, to understand it. So it's given me. I'll call you back, Mum. It's given an overall of all of it. I think that even, you know, if we've mentioned movies like Cromwell's, A Killer King, Gunpowder, anything that's in the chat, it would be of interest.
I put into, Mum, I'll call you back. Hang on. I put into this content here. And of course, anything that's of importance in the chat. So everyone's references are taken into this. And then a bit of transcription bloopers, because it's, you know, I do the transcription to get to this point. And I'm reading things like The Prison King and Waiting, so The Prison King and Waiting, or Seven Egg Section. Seven Egg Section. Actually, Seven Egg Exemption.
Seven Egg Section. One of my favourite ones. What is that? And one of my favourite ones is Just Under a Dune. Just Under a Dune. Just as you should be. I put the three of them in there to accompany. And then I'll just keep loading them as we go. Or I think you can put them on the members page. If they want to study it in its fullness. Yeah, that's amazing. That is so, so cool. I need to go back and look at all of the King stuff, because I have a little situation.
I think I'm going to have to explain that people are illegal because of 1649. So that's going to be interesting. Yeah, that sounds interesting. Yeah. Yeah. Sort of thinking of what approach I should take. But yeah, I think that's a good one. Yeah. No, that's very cool. Thank you so much. That's absolutely amazing. It's such a huge resource for everyone and takes so much time to do. So we really, really appreciate that. It's a great education.
And particularly with the one that Liz did just on Wednesday, which I'm working through, which is The Strife and Treason, it's just really gone through all the legislation there and going through what you're going to use as the mind map. And I've had such a terrible time over here with what happened with mine. I'm really looking forward to doing the equivalent of what we went through to see how I can manage what I'm going through over here.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. 1649 applies to them as well. Yeah. It's a little different situation. When you strip everything away. Yeah. And they have no jurisdiction, basically. So everyone can just go up there and you can download those PDFs. Get them in a folder on your computer if you like. Just your number eight study guide folder. I'm from Gold Coast. It's so hot. It's so hot. I fell asleep on the last couple of things because it's been so hot.
So I've just had to revisit them in the cool of the evening. Yeah. Yeah. Crazy hot by the sound of it. Crazy hot. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Oh, no, that's so cool. That's very, very awesome. You're welcome. So I'll have the PDFs, won't I? So if anybody… They're actually up there. You can just scroll up if you want them. Yeah. So grab them now, people. But if for some reason you don't or it'll be if someone's watching the recording, I'll think of some way to put them.
Yeah. Just reach out if someone wants those, doesn't have them. Yeah. We'll make sure they're available to people. Cool. Very, very cool. Thank you. That's amazing. Lynette's heading back to Sydney on the 13th. Yeah, that would be way fun, eh, Lynette? I think it's supposed to be Albert's 30th by the 13th. Oh, Blimey. Yeah. No, you can keep that. We're actually getting a bit cool over here in the evenings. That sounds dreamy. It's only probably about, I don't know, probably about 15 out there at the moment.
It's quite pleasant. Lovely. A few bloody mozzies, though. Bloody mozzies. Hopefully not those Marburg ones. Don't want those this week. Has anybody else got anything, any questions? Yeah. News, gossip, anything? Looks like everybody's good. I'm not sure how to put my hand up anymore on this. Oh, Rhonda, in the woods. We can see you. Go for it. So I just wanted to tell you that there's 2,560 schools have been served notice of conditional acceptance around their vaccination programme.
Oh, that's exciting. Yeah. Wow. How will they know what the feedback on that is, do you think? Well, what they've done is they've tried to get as many of us on the ground going into the schools to make them aware that they've been given a notice. As you can imagine, some people would end up in their spam and some people would have binned it out of hand. And so I know through from Parakeet right through to Rotorua, apparently there's been a lot of people who've gone out there and visited the schools.
But there's follow-up steps coming up. So I think today a notice went out to them all just reiterating that they needed to have looked at their notice of conditional acceptance. And if they didn't, what the repercussions might be. And so apparently there's another step in the process being sent to the schools next week. Now, I'm not 100% sure about the rumour that the vaccinators were going to go into schools this year and vaccinate the children without the parents' consent.
I'm not 100% sure if that's true. However, I know that they might send a notice home to the parents saying, hey, fill this form out. Even if you don't want your child vaccinated, you must return it signed and blah, blah, blah. They'd better bloody not because that's completely illegal. Yeah, so that's what I just researched tonight. I went, gosh, I wonder where I can find that information on school-based programmes. So I went and Googled it. Sure enough, there's that ability there for them to send the notice home.
I hope some of the parents reach out to us if that happens because under the Health Act, no, the Care of Children Act can't do that. Right. Children under 16 need parental consent. And if people are tricked into thinking, you know, yeah, if parents are tricked into thinking they have to, that's not a form of consent. The other thing that those vaccinators or whoever, they could be served notices that the whole, all the legislation around that's not, unless it's gazetted.
Yeah, because this has come up in Zoom's last couple of weeks, that the, yeah, they all have to be listed in the Gazette. Anybody giving vaccinations has to be all listed in the New Zealand Gazette. Wow, that's pretty good information. Yep. And if anybody isn't, they're not legally allowed to do what they're doing. Wow. And yeah, parents, it's really, I was just trying to think, it'll be on one of Ness's transcripts, the Health Act 1956, because I went through it.
Let me have a look. See if I can, my notes are pretty rubbish. So I might not be able to find it. I just put it in there, the Care of Children Act 2004, section 36. Oh, there you go. See, Ness is on to it. Yeah. Yep. Yep, exactly. Exactly. Not allowed. It's very clear. But if they're tricking parents into it, then that's also unlawful, illegal, whatever, I don't know, but they just shouldn't be doing it.
Yeah, well, the Ministry of Education has been served as well. Excellent. Yeah, and so the onus goes back on the Ministry of Education, because whilst the principals and the Board of Trustees are liable for any harm that comes to the children, some of them like to obey the Ministry of Education. So in order to put a stop to that, they had to put the onus back on the Ministry. So watch that space, Jan Tinetti. Yeah. Now, JP says, was informed today if a person collapses, falls ill within 14 days from the jab, they can all be solicited as unvaccinated.
Yeah, and that's been happening all the way through. That's what they've done from the beginning. They literally have. They're just like, oh, no, nothing to see here. No, nothing to do with that. So once again, if anybody knows of anybody that's doing the jabbing, you go and find out their names and let them know that they're actually, are they listed in the New Zealand Gazette, and did they know that Ashley Bloomfield had known he was not designated in any way, shape or form to do anything.
Erica. Yeah, I'd like to talk about that, that whole. Of people going into schools and vaccinating, share what's just been discussed, you know, the. The disease has to take place, the Care of Children Act, you have to be, you can't do that when kids are under 16. And if the principal doesn't listen, you need to complain to the principal or to the teachers. And if they don't listen and if they say, oh, we're just doing what the Ministry of Education is telling us, yada, yada, yada, then you contact the teachers council and make a complaint.
Because they have a role as a teacher to look after these students. And if they're not going to uphold the law, say, you know, if a teacher's dealing drugs at school or if a teacher's stealing or whatever, you make a complaint to the teachers council and they'll pay for their registration and all that kind of stuff. And then they should be dealt with. So that's the process for the complaints. It's similar to how, you know, if a medical practitioner does something bad like breaches confidentiality or gives someone the wrong drug or, yeah, it needs to go through these sorts of channels.
And so the teachers conduct is actually looked at and all principals are teachers. And if they're not following the Care of Children Act, if they're getting brainwashed by the Ministry of Education, and they already have been brainwashed, right? They allowed all these, they allowed kids under 12 to be muzzled with stupid surgical masks. I don't know if anyone did complain to the teaching council, but it needs to be brought up that they're actually breaking the law.
And then these teachers get dealt with and they'll lose their license if they have some kind of, you know, proper disciplinary process. Everyone seems to be following orders like a bunch of brown shirts. Someone told me it was OK. You know, the Secretary of Education is out there telling all kinds of baloney to schools in their little bulletin once a month. Yeah, start complaining to the actual teachers council. Yeah, parents need to, people need to step up, eh? Yeah, like, and there's nothing better than walking down there and going and talking to the principal and talking face to face.
We all seem to be great at sharing links and sharing webpages and forwarding messages and joining this telegram group and that signal group and blah, blah, blah. But nothing's as effective as going down and talking to them and saying, my child is under the age of 16. You cannot do anything without my consent as a parent. So if they try and argue and say, oh, well, you know, it's in the bulletin or it's in this announcement, then you go, well, can you put that in writing, please? And I, yeah, ask them to put it in writing.
I think, you know, you need to put the fear of their conduct, their conduct being examined by another group. Yep. I agree. I agree. Yeah. I heard someone today, it always comes as such a shock. Someone I know said that, oh, she's got a little gardening job that she does. And the owner of the property rang her up and said, oh, don't worry about coming today because one of us has tested positive for COVID. And I said, what the? Really? I said, I can't believe people are still getting tested for that.
Just saying. Did you say, are you a COVIDaholic? Oh, far out. I said to her, did you say to them that you weren't worried because it's just a cold or a flu? Oh, no, I probably should have said that. Oh, God. Give me strength. So do you like following orders? Do you like? Yep. Do you like following the herd? Are you part of the 70% that likes following the herd or are you a free thinker? Yeah.
Yeah. That's a good way to put it. Yeah. I know. COVIDidiot. I like that. That's a good one, Donna. Yep. Yep. I had a go at the farmhouse the other day. I went in to buy some feminine products and they said, do you need any help? And I said, no, I know where the feminine products are. I don't need help buying them. And then the person's wearing a mask. And I said, why are you wearing a surgical mask for? Are you in surgery? Oh, no, it's my choice.
But you don't have to. You're not in surgery. Yeah. Yeah. You need to start challenging these people. I see the warehouse put an ad on Facebook. It was actually, it was a paid ad about how they've got all these Delonghi coffee machines at $3 each because Delonghi are shutting down. And there's a stack of these coffee machines with one of the, I don't know, warehouse staff with a bloody mask on in this photo. And so I put on that in the comments.
That makes me want to not go there. God. So why are you wearing a blue surgical mask? Were you in surgery? Were there blood splatters and sinews coming out at the warehouse? Yeah. Are you scared of coughing into open wounds? Yeah. All those customers that are going to be coming in with open wounds and needing surgery. Yeah. Yeah. I don't think people realise that they're doing it until they're asked. They're just stuck in some kind of, I don't know, brain dead zombie state.
They're just following what everyone else has been doing and they haven't snapped out of it. We need to help them snap out of it. Well, that's good. Someone says here there are a lot more people confronting these doctors, clinics, etc. Oops, it took off on me. I know someone who gave a receptionist the absolute shite about asking them to wear a mask. Then everyone else took theirs off. That's awesome. That's what I'd be doing. Yeah. Only place I asked for why I wasn't wearing a mask and that was two years ago.
Never been back since. Just boycott them. Yeah. Te Whātua Ora still make masks mandatory and won't let you in even with a... Oh, won't let you in. So, Te Whātua Ora... Oh, where do they do that? Donna? Hospital. See, that's changed because my mum was in hospital several times last year and I just went... That was Middlemore. Yeah, I just went in there and one day there was a queue and the security guard said, where's your exemption? I just gave him heaps.
Said I don't have to show it. Oh, yeah, you do. And then the next time I went there, there was no one there at all. I couldn't have given two shits. The nurses didn't care. So I'd be challenging that. Yeah. What's that? They refuse to give their names when I challenge them. Yeah, gutless cowards. Of course they would. Ask them if they were in the Gazette. They won't even know what it is. They'll go... Yeah. We've got to keep going like Liz says.
We've just got to keep going. Oh, shared a file. What's Robin sharing? Oh, mask legislation. Yeah, that's right, because you've done that document. Yeah, I did it because... Well, I've got a friend who works for the Nelson DHB and she said there's a whole group of them that want to stand out. I said they need to all join the union. So I've given it to her and I've been saying to her for ages, I don't know how you get through a day with a mask on all day.
She's horrified. She just can't do it much longer, I don't think. So I put that shit together. Yeah, so where's that happening? In their workplace, did you say? DHB, Nelson Hospital. They could go out on a... That's a safety issue. Yeah, of course it is. So the first page is the legislation, that's the masking act. They shifted that masking act, masking information from one piece of legislation to another in September 2022. Yeah, she does just need to say no, Lynette.
The trouble is it's really hard for those guys because they still get everyone coming against them. But there is a decent group now. But anyway, the first page of that document's a one-pager that anyone could take in. And I wanted to do it because I know people who've gone to the hospital with someone and they've been told they can't go in with them if they don't wear a mask. And this way they can hand it to the doctor or whoever and say, well, this is the legislation.
Did you know that you don't have to wear one anymore? Anyway. Oh, that's awesome. I know it's downloadable on here. I don't know where it's gone on my phone, but email it to me as well and we can share it because we had a discussion with the Employment Relations Authority last week about another DHB and pretty much the lawyer on the other side said, yes, well, it is sort of unlawful. But then he wanted the nurse to acknowledge when she would wear a mask around, say, cancer patients, neonatal, you know, like those particularly vulnerable areas.
And she said she would wear one when there was negative air pressure and they were doing it all properly. Right. Not just wearing a surgical mask. It has to be. Get a rebreather, like Liz said, those things. Yeah, a rebreather. So that masks act, sorry, order from September 2022. That's completely valid. The DHBs or now Te Pata Ora, they're just living in la-la land. Like they think they're in the Vatican City or something and they can just ignore local law.
They think that they're a law unto themselves. So those nurses, yeah, they do need to join the Indian Robin and they need to do a Section 83 and stop wearing. If there's a big enough group of them, it'll have an impact. Yeah, absolutely. And I said to my friend, that's what happened in the UK, where they, right at the start, they stood up and she took two dabs and she didn't, but she doesn't want to take any more.
And she said she's kind of going in under the radar. They're still pressuring them to do it, do it, boosters. But she's held off, which was something anyway. So which unions? I mean, who unions should be encouraging them to have a stop wear and put in the Section 83? Yeah, well, she's got to. If not, then ask for their money back and jump ship. Well, she's been, there's someone in the organisation, I don't know if it's the union, a union rep or who, but I think it's the union rep because she said about such and such a union.
I said, doesn't matter, you can still join the No. 8 Workers' Union and they'll do a deal for you. You know, basically work with the employer. And, yeah, anyway. Yeah, policy, policy is not law. That's what people need to remember. Doesn't matter what someone's policy is or orders are. Yeah, the whole COVID thing, as Liz has pointed out, as well as never being, the orders were made, but they were never designated. Is that the right language, Erica? Please jump in if I say something.
But, yeah, they're operating on nonsense. Yeah, so it's all about education, isn't it? People have to be educated about this stuff. Yeah. Actually, can I just make one more comment? Erica knows because she peer-reviewed it for me, but I've done a human rights complaint against the council, Tasman District. So on the 5th and 12th of January 2022, I did two open letters and I pretty much put what I put in my work document, a smaller version of, and telling them they had to consider the human rights legislation and listed it in the international covenant, et cetera.
So, and after that, me and one other did 50 OIAs to the council, and finally I went in and had a look at them, and I'll tell you that, like, councils actually had to consult. And they have, it says they can use their discretion, but if they use their discretion, if you keep clicking through those jolly links down the rabbit hole in the legislation, it says if someone's significantly impacted, then they must consult. So even though it says, you know how they're sneaky, that legislation's so sneaky, but if you go down far enough, you can see they had to, and they openly said they only considered the health and safety at work gap.
Well, they didn't. Not all of it. And their risk assessments are useless. And they have incriminated themselves. So that is really cool. Wow. Anyway, I've got. Yeah. Sorry. I just want to ask you a question about that. So what was your approach to the council? What started that? Was being locked out of places? Yeah. What started it was a friend of mine worked in the library, and she did, like, about two hours a week with school kids, and they mandated, said basic, she held off as long as possible, but they said, you know, you're out, mate.
And so I thought, well, before they actually mandate, I'm going to send them a letter and warn them about the legislation that they need to be considered health and safety at work act and everything. And, you know, Bill of Rights and Human Rights Act, et cetera. And then, yeah, and then they, on the 6th of January, that was on the 5th of January on the 6th, and I emailed it and then sent a hard copy. And on the 6th of January, the CEO announced they were going to mandate the staff and be passed for the community.
And then on the 12th, I sent them a follow up letter reminding them that they need to be considering the legislation and requested to meet. Yeah. So I did it because obviously I could see the passes potentially coming and I knew my friend had been really badly treated and they didn't give a stuff. And not only that, it has been two of them or two I know were affected that lost their jobs and they were also using the technique of incriminating, of going for them for other things, which, of course, under the ERA, they get slaughtered.
And one of them was called, quote, COVID infringement. So that's what started me doing it because I was so annoyed my friend was going to lose her job. Yeah, good on you. Yeah, that's the way to go. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, we got locked out of everything up here. Yeah, it was crazy up in Auckland. Yeah. So I've got a wee letter to start getting a bit stroppy because I haven't paid my rates for a while.
So there are some, yeah, getting ideas about where to go with that. Yeah. No, good on you, Robin. That's so awesome. So can you share those documents or is it, do you want to share them? Yeah, well, I've shared them with a lot of people down, a few people down here and I'm really trying to people to, trying to get people to do it themselves because I, in Tasman, I did an open letter. It means that anyone can use my letters as backup to say you were warned and you were told that you needed to consider this.
Yeah. So I'm really happy to share it. Obviously, it's, you have to be careful with it, but I can send it to you, Emma. And if people want to reach out to me, message me or whatever. And if your motives are pure, then I'll send it through. Yeah. And I'm happy just to talk about it too, but it's pretty straightforward. And without Liz and all of you guys and Erica, through the year, it wouldn't have got done because it's all the legislation that, well, some of it I've found myself, but most of it is through the site.
And so way back when people said, some people were saying, oh, Section 83, nothing happened. Well, that's not true. I know two people who kept their jobs because of Section 83 letters. And I know people like myself that actually got traction and ended up getting a settlement because they actually used that information. So it has been useful all year. Wow. That's amazing. Yeah. Now, you've only got a set amount of time, though. So that's why, in the end, I decided to do it because it was all threats of Marburg and stuff.
And I thought, well, they're just going to do it to us again. I'm glad I'll get it in. It only took two days. The other one took, well, yeah, my work one, but this one took two days, quick as. And now it would take very little time to adjust it to anyone, and probably in New Zealand. But it needs to be in by, for Tasman, it was the 3rd of April, because on the 4th they lifted the mandate, the V passes.
Yeah. Yeah. So we haven't got much more time. Yeah. OK, cool. I sent Auckland Council and Taupo Council a section 83 letters. So they were informed, and your document, well, one, yeah, that could be used for a human rights complaint, but it could also be used for a health and safety prosecution in the civil court as well. Yeah, it could be. In the district court. Yeah, although I keep the health and safety out for... Yeah, for the discrimination.
Yeah, I just, I did the Health Act and Bill of Rights and ICCPR and stuff like that. Yeah. But no, what I've done is, Erica's actually got a link. So Erica, maybe you could share, do you want to, I'll share with you, Emma, and Erica's got the link because she's gone and peer reviewed it and fixed it up for me. Oh, how awesome. Yeah, I just put my email in the chat to you. Thanks. I've got it anyway.
Thank you. Awesome. Yeah, fantastic. Yeah, because my thing is that as a council, they are supposed to provide a service, which they haven't done because they shut us out of everything, libraries and, you know, they would have locked us out of toilets if they could have, swimming pools and council buildings couldn't go to council meetings and all of this stuff. So why the heck would we be paying them? That's right. I stopped paying mine about then, but I put my place on a loadie a bit before that anyway, I think, or about the same time.
How's that going? Well, I did, I mean, I don't really know. I got Kevin McCracken to help me with a letter. I emailed him and said, look, I've gone back with, well, essentially they're conditional attendance letters, but just saying, you know, you need to prove that we have a contract with you, etc. Pretty much the Bill Turner thing, don't tell Liz. And, but it's, yeah, they never rebuffed anything. And then it went to debt collection. There are a few of us and mine went to debt collection a lot sooner, which is really good because I don't have a contract with the debt collectors.
And of course, the councils don't want it to go to court because it's going to expose the fraud. Yeah. Oh, fantastic. Well, that's a huge win. That really is. Well, maybe. The thing is, like, I know that I'm a target because I've done all these different things out there. And the thing with the Council with Human Rights is they're not allowed to target you in any way if, because you go in on that subject alone and they are not allowed to put you under duress in any other way on any other topic.
So if they do, they're in serious trouble. Yeah. Yeah. And they have no jurisdiction anyway. And the CEO of Auckland, I know for a fact, the CEO of Auckland Council quit because of some papers he was served. And ours quit about the same time as I put one of mine in and then someone else got served probably the same papers you know about down here, potentially. And when did the Auckland CEO quit? Well, he's still in there, but he's, yeah, a couple of weeks ago.
There's a Hamilton group that's doing some amazing stuff. Yeah. And they're really getting going. They've served Hamilton CEO as well because it turns out that the CEO of the councils is actually the ratepayer. It's not us. And they've proved it in law. So the CEO of Auckland made the decision to mandate vaccines for libraries and stuff without any vote. But that's a breach of local government body act. Wow. Yep. You're supposed to do consultation like what Robin was saying.
And they were informed of that last year. Oh, well, they're probably customer care centre. I don't think it ever made it to the legal team. Yep. Yeah. Because it's such a machine, such a monster. But yeah, no, they know. They know it's coming. So that other thing that someone mentioned further back, the, what was it? The NZ something or other. That's another, when you look at what they're doing with that. Oh, I've lost it now. It's not local government funding authority.
Yes. That's being uncovered to be. So what's that? What's SFO Donna? Is that the fraud office? Something. What's SFO stand for? Serious Fraud Office. Yeah, well, it's not just Hamilton. I can tell you that. It's all of them, what they're doing. And it's, I mean, the fraud office is probably just going to cover it up. But yeah, the way we pay our rates quarterly, I'm not, I'd have to hear it again, how they're actually, what they're actually doing.
But they're, yeah, basically doing, you know, like, yeah, bills of exchange. 12 CES is 12 CEOs. Yeah, it's, so they're actually, in law, they're actually the rate payers. It's not us. Yeah, so, and it's a bit like the CEO of IRD is the rate, is the taxpayer, not us. So it's all starting to come out. Money is the root of all evil. Using our trust, then using the rates to cut. Yeah. Yep. That's exactly right, Donna.
It's really coming out. It's gathering. And they're also, I've got, went to a meeting a few days back, and yeah, once I get the transcript from that, there's lots and lots of legislation in there that's going to be useful. I'll have to do a nest on it. Not that I'm very good at doing that, but yeah. So that's awesome. I better stop talking because I'm probably saying too much. Has anybody else got anything they want to contribute? Yeah, we're supposed to be talking in and stuff.
Yeah, but it's all, I think it's all, it's all relevant, isn't it? You know, once you start uncovering something about one thing, you can apply it. And talking to people. Yeah. Yeah, it's all connected. I agree. It's all connected. Yeah. Cool. Yeah, no, that's awesome. Very, very much a team effort. It's great to have you guys, have all you guys along. Yeah. No, no worries. That's good. Well, perhaps we'll wrap it up. Yeah, people are kicking butt.
They surely, surely are. And the ones I know are having quite a lot of fun doing it, which is a really interesting approach. They're not scared. They're just, yeah, treating the other side like regular, regular people. That's very cool. So, yeah. Thanks for coming along. I'll stop the recording. Good night, Facebook. We'll stop that.
