Contradiction of Thoughts Brought Out Concerning False Doctrine in Home and the Altercation

The speaker is frustrated because someone is not understanding their point. They are trying to explain that there is no connection between different incidents that occurred. The speaker believes that false doctrine was being spoken and that they did not have to intervene because God would take care of it. They mention an altercation between two people, Chiara and Rachel, but emphasize that it has nothing to do with a previous incident involving Jacob. The speaker feels that the other person is not accepting the truth and is not listening properly. They conclude by expressing their certainty in their own understanding of the situation. When you're telling stories, you should have the facts to tell it right, because you just say things that are not accurate. It's hard to believe that you don't know that they're not accurate. You don't know how to fill in the rest of the service, but you just say things. And they don't be true. That was true what you said about Jacob. You tied that in with Rachel and Chiara, and they didn't have nothing to do with it. What I was saying was that when there was a thing going on, I didn't have to get involved in that. God took care of it. And what Chiara was saying, even though she was in the wrong place, and you come in here speaking false doctrines. That's what I was talking about. You talked to Chiara and Rachel, and they had nothing to do with Jacob and what she was saying. I was speaking of it as some things that came in the house when the children visited here. And nobody knew, which they don't. They were tied in two incidents together. You went from one to the other. Like you made a transition from Jacob to the next morning, there was problems with them that had nothing to do with it. You don't see how it had anything. I understand. I won't argue. How can you connect something that's not connected? In the message, we were talking about not receiving anybody coming into the house with different doctrines than what we've learned. And how I didn't have to do anything but pray, and God took care of it, and expressing that false doctrine was coming in here. And I had the signs already out on the porch. It had nothing to do with Rachel waking Chiara up. Okay. They're not connected. Okay. Why would you connect them? If I didn't know any better, I would think that spirit that came in, that you didn't rebuke, but you didn't have anything to do with it, came out the next day with some ruckus going on, and you tied them in like they were connected. They were not connected. In other words, I didn't have to handle it. Somebody came in here with stuff. Rachel was speaking some stuff. That's all it was, was stuff. And Jacob was speaking nothing but stuff. And I didn't have to do much with it other than praying and holding to God, and God took care of it the next day to make the message go forth that false doctrine was coming in there. It had nothing to do with it the next morning. It had something to do with it because it was said, and I didn't have to say it, that false doctrine was coming in here. The next morning was about Chiara and somebody waking up the girl up while she was asleep. That had nothing to do with Jacob and what he was saying. I'm talking about the altercation between Chiara and Rachel. Had nothing to do with Jacob. Okay, honey. You said that to me. I don't understand what you are saying. It's the truth. Are you going to accept it or are you going to reject the truth? Well, I can tell what I thought about it, how it connected. Well, please enlighten me on how. I told you and you didn't receive it. Tell me how. Deanna. It wasn't Deanna. Deanna was involved. Oh, well, Deanna wasn't the one who had the altercation. Please tell me how Deanna and Rachel talking. It was Rachel. It was the girl. It was Chiara and Rachel. I didn't say Deanna. Stop talking for a minute and listen. Chiara was asleep. Deanna came in there and said something to Rachel. They were whispering, but they weren't whispering loud enough. He woke Chiara up. Chiara didn't want to be woke because she ain't an early person. And it started from there. That incident had nothing to do with Jacob and whatever he said or whatever was said the night before. Those two incidents, anybody in the room full of people was here could see there was no connection. This is a whole other day about a whole other thing, about nothing. Somebody was talking about gospel truth or religion, about somebody sleeping, and they was woke up. But Chiara said to Rachel what was going on the night before. That's where the connection comes in. She didn't. She woke the girl up out of her sleep. But Chiara started talking to Rachel. She started talking to Rachel, telling her to be quiet because I'm trying to sleep. And then she told her that you left your false adoption. She connected her with the falseness that was going on the night before. That's what Chiara did. She did say that. But she meant that in there. She put that in it. She let Rachel know that she helped and was along with the false doctrine. That's the only connection I made. I didn't say nothing about her waking up or anything like that. I'm talking about what Chiara said. But I'm talking about what Chiara said as a result of that. You're saying no, but that's what Chiara said. It was, but she mentioned some things in there about the falseness. Kaylin? Kaylin! You just need to get your troubles straight. This ain't the first time. I listened to you. You go off on different things, and you bring stuff in that has no relevance to what you've been talking about. I don't know who you are. You say God gave you the message. I'm trying to make a point here. That was the next thing. I can own up that I can make a mistake about some certain things. But I know in myself what my connection was that was there. Thank you.