Exhibit H

The speaker mentions that the past two meetings were recorded and if they don't receive the terms they want, it could lead to a contract breach. They have evidence to prove that the other party was aware of possible events but didn't disclose them, which is a breach of contract. They may go to court for termination. They mention a meeting with AP. And I would like to mention the fact that the past two meetings we had were fully recorded And if we do not receive the terms We would like to receive this would probably get bigger because we are going to call contract breach and we will have sufficient evidence that's to say we have sufficient evidence to prove that YTN was able to not foresee these kind of possible events and the only justification coming was UADC and they were lying to us which is a contract breach and an Exploitation of the other party which is a contract termination according to law and the opposing side has premise to go to court and say this is a Plausible legal ground to call for termination So that's that's our solvency legal grounds and What we want and we don't want to go to legal Contract breach, sorry Is meeting with AP