everything except 16

The author discusses Nell studying the interdimensional theory and offers 14 variations of alien beings living adjacent to our reality. They then introduce the crypto-terrestrial hypothesis, suggesting that NHIs are responsible for UFOs and already present in the Earth's atmosphere. The theory explains away the need for interdimensional or space travel. The author mentions cases of UFOs being seen underwater and around volcanoes, and talks about an underground city named Lumeria. They also discuss limited knowledge of evolution and the possibility of a splintered race of humans. The author gives examples of historical sites that challenge our understanding of human existence. They mention the lack of exploration in underwater and unexplored areas on Earth and Mars. Then we get to page number five. Now, page number five is a continuation of page number four, where he explains that Nell is studying the interdimensional theory in which he in which Nell, I want you to update. Then we get to page number five. Now, page number five is a continuation of page number four, where he explains that Nell is studying the interdimensional theory hypothesis. Then we get to page number five. Now, page five is a continuation of page four, where he explains that Nell is studying the interdimension hypothesis, the interdimension, oh my goodness. Then we get to page number five. Now, page five is a continuation of page four, where he explains that Nell is studying the interdimensional hypothesis theory in which Nell offers 14 different variations of different beings, and he basically just says, and he basically just saying that all these alien beings live adjacent to our reality or dimension. Now, I'm not the sharpest, now I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed, so I had trouble deciphering what he actually meant here, but he has this cool little chart for identifying all these different types of aliens, so maybe somebody smarter than me could explain it to us in the section. So maybe somebody smarter than me could explain it to us in the comments about what page five is about. But from here, we finally get into the hypothesis, the crypto-terrestrial hypothesis. The theory suggests that NHIs are responsible for UFO, and that they're already present in the Earth's atmosphere in some sense or another. He explains that this is probably the most ridiculous idea ever, because it's so far-fetched, but that it's also the most plausible, because it explains away one very important part about the interdimensional theory. It explains away the fact that interdimensional beings would have to find a way to travel to our world or our dimension, and it also explains away the fact that aliens would have to travel around. But from here, we finally get into the hypothesis, the crypto-terrestrial hypothesis. But from here, we finally get into the hypothesis, the crypto-terrestrial hypothesis. The theory suggests that NHIs are responsible for UFOs, and that they're already present in the Earth's atmosphere or environment in one way or the other. He explains that this is probably the most ridiculous idea ever, because it's so far-fetched, but that it's also the most plausible, because it explains one very important part about extra-dimensional beings. It explains the fact that interdimensional beings would have to find a way to travel to our world or our dimension, and it would also explain away that aliens would have to cross the cosmos, and it would also explain away aliens that would have to cross the cosmos to visit us. So with this theory, you wouldn't need to explain the pesky little inconvenience of space or interdimensional travel. So if anybody comes up to you and asks, why would aliens come visit Earth? It's just a little planet with these dumb violent apes that no one wants to know anything about. You just tell them, well, that's easy, because these aliens can't leave Earth either. So page number 6, we get into our first case about underground aliens, or CTH, and he starts talking about how UFOs are mostly seen underwater. The author mentions that the Disclosure Act would also include UFOs underwater, because a majority of the UFOs are actually seen by submariners. Is that the correct term? Submariners? I don't know. But he starts talking about a former Russian Navy officer named Vladimir Azaha, who states that 50% of all UFO encounters are connected to the ocean or a body of water. And he quotes two different incidents that show that UFOs always try to go underground, with one being from a man named Lou Elizondo, a former intelligence officer closely linked to the UFO investigation for the US, where he describes an incident involving a circular object rising from the deep near the Caribbean Islands. This object was around the size of a small island and rose up on two separate occasions, which I wonder if there's, like, photographic proof of this. I mean, you see this large island-like structure just rising from the ocean. I'm sure with all our satellites around here, somebody has a photo of that, right? There probably is, and it's just probably classified, but if someone were to whistle blow, they should probably get a photo of that. But his second case is that the UFOs are mostly seen around volcanoes, and he points to the volcano named Popocatepetl, who is located in Mexico, and he says that this volcano is a hotspot for UFO activities, and believes that these UFOs go into the volcano as a way to go underground. He then starts talking about a man named Ray Palmer and talks about how, he then states, he then starts talking about how Ray Palmer talked about this underground city of Lumeria that was located underground, and you know, and he's kind of implying that this alien city is actually Lumeria, and he mentions that Ray Palmer was very insistent that this city is real. And I'm actually doing some research on Lumeria, since I haven't really heard anybody talk about this, but let me know if that's a video you want to see. So page number 7, so now we're on page number 7, and here he goes more in depth about the theory saying that you wouldn't have to explain space travel and all that. So now we're on page number 7, and he goes more in depth about, so now we're on page number 7, and he goes more in depth on the theory saying that you wouldn't have to explain space travel and all that. So now we're on page number 7 here, and he goes more in depth about the theory saying that you wouldn't have to explain travel through space and all that, and he also talks about why it would be easier to explain why aliens are interested in Earth, because they wouldn't have to leave Earth, and he also talks about why aliens are so concerned about nuclear weapons, because, let's be honest, he mentions that if we blow up Earth, we would blow them up too, in a way, which is a pretty valid point, you know, but maybe that's why we're hearing more about aliens nowadays, because, you know, they're also worried about World War III apparently starting. But he also talks about how these aliens would also be our long-lost relatives, but he also talks about how these aliens could also be our long-lost relatives that just decided to live underground, and that's why they look so much like us. But here we get to our next section, Limited to Historical, Geological, and Biological Knowledge, and the main idea in this section is kind of just talking about how we don't have a lot of information about evolution, and that we could have—let me just say it But here we get to our next section, Limited to—here we get to our next section, Limited to Historical, Geological, or Biological Knowledge, and a main idea—and the main idea about this section is kind of just talking about how we don't have enough information—and the main idea in this section is kind of just talking about how we don't have a lot of information about evolution, and that we could have a long-lost relative that splintered away from our evolutionary tree, and the main argument here is that since we don't have 90 percent of our fossil records, that there's still a possibility that at one point we splintered away to make a different race of humans. Now page 8 kind of reinforces that last idea. He talks about how we're—he talks about how we were so certain that humans were only around 4,000 to 600 years old. Now page 8 kind of reinforces that last idea. He talks about how we were so certain that humans were only around 4,000 to 600—oh my goodness. Now page 8 kind of reinforces that last idea. He talks about how we were so certain that humans were only around either 4,000 or 6,000 years, but with the discovery of Gobekli Tepe—but with the discovery of Gobekli Tepe, we have to—we have to—but with the—but with the—oh my goodness. But with the discovery of Gobekli Tepe—but with the discovery of Gobekli Tepe, we have to re-evaluate how long we were actually here for. And again, he gives three examples of how we were—and again, he gives three examples of how we were here longer than we thought. And again, he gives three examples on—oh my goodness. And again, he gives three examples on how we were here longer than we actually think we were. He talks about a stone-like—he talks about a stonehenge-like structure that was found in Lake Michigan that is thought to be around 10,000 years old and how Ganonpadon site is actually—and how Ganonpadon—and how Ganonpadon site is thought to be built around 25,000 to 4,000 BC. Now I have heard that that's actually not true, although I haven't really looked into it. But I just heard that it's not true, and I'm not here—but I'm not here to fact-check this. I'm just here to present the—but I'm not here to fact-check this. I'm just here to present it to you guys. So I should have probably said that in the very beginning of the video—oops. But then he goes more on reinforcing the idea that we don't have enough information about the Earth, and we only have a small fraction of our actual fossils of every animal that ever lived on Earth, which, in my opinion, is kind of dumb because by that logic, you can say that anything is possible just because we don't have proof to disprove it. The burden of proof should always fall on the person making the claim, not the other way around. But whatever. I'll let it slide. But he talks about how—but then he talks more about how there's plenty of places where we haven't explored, like a lot of the underwater sections of the ocean are still unexplored, and he also talks about how the Alaskan Triangle is also unexplored. And from there, he then jumps to talk about how we haven't really explored Mars. And he talks about something that kind of caught my eye. He talks about this photograph of a record of debris from an extraterrestrial spacecraft, partially buried bones, and a body of a humanoid stretched out in what looks like to be a cushion. And according to him, this was taken from the NASA telescope. And according to him, this was taken from a—and according to him, this was found by—and according to him, this was found by a guy who used a NASA telescope and found it off the—and according to him, this was found from the—and according to him, this was found on a—and according to him, this was found in a NASA telescope that was looking at Mars at one point. Now, from here, he then goes on—now, he does mention that this could just be pareidolia, which is the idea that our brain just sees stuff at—now, he goes on to mention that this could just be pareidolia, which is the idea that our brain just sees stuff at a—now, he goes on to mention that this could just be pareidolia, which is the idea that our brain tries to make sense at a randomness. But it leads me to the idea that—but it leads to the idea that we haven't really explored anything and that there's still plenty to explore out there. We just haven't—now, he goes on to mention that this could just be a case of pareidolia, which is the idea that our brain tries to make sense at a randomness. But it leads to the idea that we haven't really explored anything and that there's still plenty of—for us to—and that there's still plenty of—and that there's still—oh, my goodness. Now, he goes on to mention that this could just be an example of pareidolia, which is the idea that our brains just see stuff at a randomness. But it leads to the idea that we haven't really explored anything and there's still a lot for us to search for. Now, he goes on to mention that this could just be a case of pareidolia, which is the idea that our brains just see stuff at a randomness. But it leads to the idea that we haven't really explored anything and that there's still plenty for us to explore. Now, page number nine, we—now, page number nine—now, page number nine, we lead more into the idea that not—now, page number nine, we lead more into the idea that not everything is explored, and he goes on to the idea of a shadow biome. Now, in the paper, he talks kind of in depth about the shadow biome, but basically, it's just a theoretical idea saying that there's this underlying biome in the molecular level that cannot be perceived with our current tools. And he gets this idea saying that a lot of the jellyfish UFOs could actually be part of this shadow biome, and we just can't clearly perceive it ourselves. And like I said before, I feel like this whole section is kind of dumb because you're just kind of speculating that anything is possible just because we don't have proof that it doesn't exist. But that's just me. And from here, we get into our next section, Traces of the Lost Civilization, and the main idea here is that every single culture pretty much shares the same legends, and he talks about how scientists have dismissed the legends of myths, but that it could actually be an unsophisticated way of preserving history. And he talks about how scientists have dismissed these legends as myths, but that it could actually be an unsophisticated way of preserving history, and he points out how every single culture has a flood myth, and he points to how every single culture has a flood myth, and points to the Sumerians, the Greeks, and the Bible. He then points to the story of Atlantis, saying that Atlantis is very similar to another story by the Cretes of a group of highly advanced Bronze civilization that lived on an island, but were ultimately killed by a volcano that erupted. Then from here, he points to Yonaguni, which is like the stone-like structure that was located outside of Japan that kind of resembles Atlantis, and that's page number 9. Page number 10, he then links the idea of Atlantis back to the eastern islands, and this is the island where those big heads that nobody knows where they came from, but he talks about how people believe that there are these technologically advanced ancient civilizations called the Mu or Lemuria, and they were thought to be the empire of the world until the ocean swallowed them up, which I think he's referring back to like the flood myths, how every single culture has a great flood, but the survivors of this island were thought to be the nucleus of the world, and went around spreading civilization to every part of the world. He then says that it's all speculative, but he just wanted to add this part because it makes a cool story, I guess. I mean, it does make a cool story, so I'll give him that, but from here, he transitions to the idea that we've been here a lot longer than originally thought, and he mentions three examples of ancient tools that... But from here, he transitions to the idea that we've been here a lot longer than originally thought, and he mentions three examples. He quotes that we have these three tools that have been here a lot longer than originally believed. The first one is a wooden lock that was found in Colombo Falls, Zambia, and it's thought to be 500,000 years old. The second is a fossilized imprint of a wheel found in Ukraine in a coal mine, and that one is thought to be dated around 3 million years ago. And the third one is a 2 centimeter screw embedded in a rock found in Russia, and that one is thought to be 3 million years old. And there's one more, there's a book that was found in Western Australia that is thought to be around 350,000 years old, and there's also a book that is thought to be found in Western Australia, and there's also a book that is found in Western Australia that is thought to be around 350 million years old. Now again, I don't know if this is true, this is just what the paper says, and I'm not the Harvard researcher guy, this guy is. But page number 11, traces... But page number 11, traces of the underground civilization. Now here he starts off the section just proving the fact that people can live underground, and he mentions the city of Derekuyu in Turkey, which is an underground city that is believed to house like around 20,000 people, including their livestock and food storage. And this is thought to be... And this is believed to be inhabited around 8th to 7th century BC. Now on a side note, this is awesome. Now it didn't really go in depth about the city, but I kind of wanted to point out that this thing is awesome to look at, and this has... Now on a side note, this thing is awesome. Now on a side note, this thing is awesome. It didn't really go in depth on the paper about the city, but if you look at it, this thing is like 7 stories high underground. Now on a side note, this thing is awesome. Now the paper didn't really go in depth about this city, but if you look at it, it's actually pretty awesome. 7 stories underground, and it's just crazy because this was built way before we even had the... Let me just go... Now on a side note, this thing is awesome. It didn't really go in depth on the paper about how cool this city is, but I kind of wanted to point out that this thing is awesome to look at. You have like around 7 stories underground. You have this 7 story underground city that's like 700 BC, which leads me to believe that maybe... Which leads me to believe that maybe at some point they needed to go underground because of the flood, but maybe not because I think the flood would have just drowned them. But yeah, this city is pretty awesome. But from here, he mostly talks about how it's possible to live underground and how we just recently built Norad under the Cyan Mountains, and that the furthest a human can dig is 4,000 meters because after that, it gets way too hot because of the coarse mantle. And he mainly talks about how it would be hard for... And he mainly talks about here... And here he mainly talks about how it would be... And here he mainly talks about how it wouldn't be hard for humans to live underground. The biggest difficulty would just be getting enough vitamin D because we're all underground, but he says that something like that could easily be fixed with a diet. And then from here, he goes on to speculate how easy it would be for a human to do... And then from here, he speculates that it would be easy for a human to do, so if it's easy for us, it should be even easier. And then from here, he speculates that it would be easy for a human to do, so if it's easy for us, it should be even easier for an alien race that's adapted to live underground. And that's kind of his whole case for this thing. And that's kind of his whole case here. He then transitions to this... He then transitions this to the idea that aliens could actually be Sasquatches, and that 20% of living mammals are undescribed, and it could be possible that aliens are some kind of Sasquatch or Bigfoot, and he goes back to the idea that we haven't explored the Alaskan Triangle. And then he wraps it all together saying that... And then he wraps his ideas by saying that some Brazilian farmer had reported an alien crash on his farm, and that three hairy little sloth-looking things that are assumed to be aliens with like fur came out and walked around in his farm, which is pretty funny. But then he ties it back together to the... But then from here, he tries to... But then from here, he ties it all together to the aliens that were presented back in Mexican Congress in 2023, saying that these could be a possibility of the idea of... But then from here, he links it back to like those aliens that were presented in Mexican Congress in 2023, saying that this could also be an example of that. And that's page 11. Now page number 12, we get to the idea of alien races being dinosaurs. And if you haven't noticed... Now page number 12, we get to this idea that alien races... Now page number 12, we get to the idea of alien races being dinosaurs. Now if you haven't noticed, the paper is starting to lose me a little bit. But I thought this story... Okay, I know. Now page number 12, we get to this idea that alien races... Now page number 12, we get to the idea of alien races being dinosaurs. And if you haven't noticed that this paper was actually starting to lose me in those last couple of pages. But this theory is actually kind of interesting. And the idea he puts here is that... He researched that aliens are actually a long-lost relative of dinosaurs. And he points to this idea that dinosaurs called Trudons, Trudons, Trudons, Trudons could actually... Trudons could have possibly survived extinction and evolved... Trudons could have actually survived extinction and evolved. And the reason he believes this is because these trade dunes are thought to be the smartest... And the reason he believes this is because these dinosaurs are thought to be the smartest dinosaurs to have ever... And the reason he believes this is because these dinosaurs are thought to be the smartest dinosaurs to have ever lived and is believed to have survived extinction by living underground. And according to Wikipedia, this dinosaur's brain is like gigantic. And he kind of backs up this idea by presenting the idea of Nagas, which are thought to be this snake-like race of humans that live underground in the city called Papala, according to the Hindus. And he also mentions that one of the CIA directors, I forgot his official title, but his name was John Ramirez, and he said that it could be possible that this reptilian race is living among us, so it's cool to think about, but maybe not if they eat us. But then he goes on to talk about how this underworld Shambhala has a lot of possible entrances in Russia, and that Mount Shasta, which is another mountain found in California, is thought to be linked to Lemuria, which is also an underground city. And then he talks about how Shasta's this weird place. And then he kind of just talks about how Mount Shasta's like a weird place where a lot of people disappear. But that's page 12. Now, page 13, we start talking about fairies, and the main idea here is that fairies, back in the day, used to kidnap people and take them away for a long time, and it's not that these fairies are actually aliens, and it's possible that these fairies could actually be aliens, and he kind of breaks it down, but I don't want to go too far into it, and he kind of breaks it down, like the history of all the aliens, and he kind of breaks it down, like the history of all the fairies, and he has this idea that it could be possible that aliens actually look like fairies. I don't want to get too into it. I thought this section was kind of dumb, but that's the gist of it. Now page 14, we talk more about fairies, and we also talk about how Admiral Byrd, the famous admiral that flew over Antarctica, had this strange encounter of a city inside the earth, and was inhabited by an advanced race of beings. Now we kind of talk more, now we talk about how, now he also talks about how a lot of this has actually been, now he talks a lot about how, now he talks a lot about, now he kind of talks about how a lot of this has been debunked, and that's kind of like the main gist of it, fairies, and there could be an entrance over Antarctica, but I don't want to get too far into it also, doesn't really help us understand aliens today. But page number 15, he talks about the doses, but page number 15, but page number 15, but page number 15, he talks about the Dulce base that is located in Dulce, New Mexico, and it's thought to be a base that is controlled by the U.S. government and non-human species, and he kind of clarifies that this base has a lot of disinformation around it, and that he talks about how the dark side of the moon is a hot spot for crypto-terrestrials, and that they have some sort of interest in it, and it is believed that the moon is actually an artificial construction by non-human species, and that two whistleblowers from NASA named Carl Wolf and Ken Johnson claim that there's more conclusive evidence of potential bases which NASA allegedly concealed, and that Apollo astronauts, particularly Edgar Mitchell's, have also spoken about the encounter of this NHI crash site, and recovered bodies asserted that extraterrestrial beings have visited Earth for a long time. Let me do that one again, that one's super sloppy. So page number 15, he talks about the Dulce base that is located in Dulce, New Mexico, and it's thought to be a base that's controlled by U.S. government and a non-human species, and he clarifies that this base has a lot of disinformation around it, and that he talks about, but from here he then talks about the dark side of the moon, how it's a hot spot for crypto-terrestrials, and for some reason they have some sort of interest on the dark side of the moon, and that it is believed that the moon is an artificial construction by non-human species, and that two whistleblowers from NASA named Carl Wolf and Ken Johnson claim that there's more conclusive evidence of a potential base which NASA allegedly concealed, and that Apollo astronauts, particularly Ed Mitchelson, has spoken about. The encounter with NHI spacecraft and recovered bodies asserted that the extraterrestrial beings have been visiting Earth for a long time, but hopefully that's enough. Now page 16, we finally get to our conclusion, and he mentions that all these possibilities are very unlikely, so I guess it's just a research paper for fun, but it concludes it with these four theories, and the first one is theory number one, human crypto-terrestrials and its idea that advanced ancient human civilizations that were largely destroyed but continue to exist in a remnant form. Theory number two is the humanoid or theropod crypto-terrestrials, which is an advanced non-human civilization possibly evolved from terrestrials. Theory number two is the hominid or theropod crypto-terrestrials, which is the idea that aliens underground are actually dinosaurs. Theory number three is the former extraterrestrial or extra-temporal crypto-terrestrial and the idea that accepts a...is that acceptable? And the idea here is that these are like...theory number three is the former extraterrestrials or extra-temporal crypto-terrestrials and the idea here is that there's some sort of ancient beast, there's some sort of inter-dimensional beings that live underground. And the last hypothesis is the magical crypto-ser...and the last hypothesis is the magical crypto-terrestrials and so they're akin to fairies, and this one just says that these aliens could actually be like fairies or aliens that look like fairies and that's why they're like that. But this one's like the silliest, but he basically is saying that...is that it could be possible that these aliens look more like fairies and that their technology just looks more like magic. And that's the whole paper. And that's the whole paper, well, kind of, because it doesn't really do that last part fucking.